Is it just me ...
My first Bible was the King James Version. It is still the version that comes to mind whenever I think of a passage. So, initially, I was quite excited to learn that celebrations were being planned for the 400th anniversary of its publication next year. Excitement, however, turned to incredulity and then, I have to say, something bordering on anger, when I went on a website dedicated to the celebration. (www.2011trust.org)
Here they have Richard Dawkins - a militant atheist, no less - extolling the KJV!
One of the biggest struggles I have had in the past has been with those who think that Church services should be in Shakespearian English. Many who argue thus - not all, I accept - are more concerned with a cultural elitism than with hearing the Word of God. Richard Dawkins sums it up in a phrase: 'The Bible doesn't have to be tied to religion.'
This website in its very promotion and celebration of the KJV has demonstrated why we can't any longer use it in public worship. We simply cannot be identified with this sort of snobbery.
Here is another quote from the website:
Professor Dawkins was asked why he wanted to participate in the initiative. "You can't appreciate English literature unless you are steeped to some extent in the King James Bible", he replied, "people don't know that proverbial phrases which make echoes in their minds come from this Bible. We are a Christian culture, we come from a Christian culture and not to know the King James Bible, is to be in some small way, barbarian".