I am pleased to say that after some technical problems, it is possible to hear sermons form my Church again very clearly via the web-site (www.christchurch.com.hk). Yesterday, I was preaching about the Law, Christian freedom and ethics!
Today is the First Sunday after Trinity. The Church’s calendar is rather imbalanced! For the past few months, we have been celebrating all the major festivals of the Church: Advent, Christmas, Epiphany, Easter, Ascension, Pentecost and, last week, Trinity Sunday itself and with them the seasons around then. Now we have stretched out before us the many Sundays of Trinity. One poet wrote in a poem:
We have done with dogma and divinity
East(er) and Whitsun past,
The long, long, Sundays after Trinity
Are with us at last.
Before, however, we settle into counting the Sundays of Trinity over the Summer. I want to delay the count by a week to think today of the meaning of a special day that was celebrated by many Christians on the Thursday just past. If you lived in places like
Not all Christians celebrate
, Roman Catholics do, some Anglicans do, the rest do not. This perhaps illustrates the division and confusion amongst Christians about the meaning of what we call Holy Communion. For us the Eucharist (another name for Holy Communion) is the central part of worship each week as it is in many Churches around the world. For Roman Catholic Christians, the Mass (another name for Holy Communion or the Eucharist) is so important that it is celebrated daily. Yet even for us who celebrate frequently, it is not always clear either why or what it means. Corpus Christi
In the 16th, there was an attempt at Reforming the Church in
Europe associated with names such as Luther, Zwingli and Calvin. But even these reformers couldn’t agree with each other as to the meaning of Holy Communion. Luther and Zwingli fell out bitterly over it and the division, sadly, remains today. Even in the Anglican Church, there are real differences as to the meaning of Holy Communion.
There is not enough time to go into details this morning about the meaning of the Eucharist. Although can I pause advertise the Lent Bible Studies next year, which I provisionally intend to be on this subject. I am responding to a suggestion after this year’s Bible Studies!
Basically though, the differences are between those who think that something is actually happening in Communion and those who see it more as a visual aid to help us remember Christ’s death for us. Roman Catholics, for example, believe that the bread and wine quite really do become the body and blood of Christ. Many evangelicals think nothing happens at all.
What we can be absolutely certain of is that the last thing Jesus did before he was arrested was to have a meal with his disciples that he commanded them to continue. It wasn’t the Church who came up with this idea, but our Lord himself.
And while there is much that we do not know about the Early Church, we do know that they took this command of our Lord’s ‘to do this in remembrance of him’ very seriously, so seriously that we also know that in the mid-50s just 20 years or so after our Lord gave the command to his disciples, Christians in Greece were keeping it and celebrating the Eucharist. And so it continues today.
We know then that this is something our Lord wanted us to do and that from the beginning it is something that Christians have done. In the first few centuries of the Church, Christians look it so seriously that they excluded people from receiving Communion who weren’t baptized or in good standing with the Church. So if someone was a known sinner, they would be excommunicated that is, forbidden communion. The Roman Catholic Church still continues this practice.
Nowadays, Christians who take the Eucharist very seriously go out of their way to include people pointing out that Jesus himself ate with sinners. Judas who was to betray Jesus wasn’t excluded from the first communion.
All of which brings me to Anglicans and to our own Church. Historically, Anglicans have attempted a middle way in all this. I will talk more about this in Lent next year. We have sought to avoid extremes. Anglicans in the past have said that anyone who is confirmed may receive Communion.
Let me pause for a moment to talk about Confirmation. With the rise of infant baptism in the Church, the need was felt for a way for adults to confirm the faith into which they were baptized as a child. At Confirmation, the Church confirmed God’s acceptance of that person. It as at this point that people started receiving Communion.
Nowadays, the Church doesn’t demand Confirmation for a person to receive communion. The trouble is this has led to confusion over the meaning of Confirmation and over when people can receive Communion.
many do not receive communion, but come forward to be blessed instead. Also here at Christ Church , many have chosen not to be confirmed. It so happens that we are now looking forward to our Confirmation service in the Autumn. Christ Church
Now let me be clear. Here at
we fully respect everyone’s privacy and right to decide for themselves whether and when they take Communion. We also respect people’s right to decide for themselves whether they are confirmed or not. Could I today as we remember Christ Church , however, ask this of you? Corpus Christi
Please would you if you don’t receive Communion, think about why you don’t. And if you haven’t been confirmed, could I encourage you to at least consider it. Classes will be held before hand to help people think it through with no obligation to go through with it if they decide not to. Communion and Confirmation are important to us and we would like to explain why.
For today I would to conclude simply by saying this. Being a Christian is hard. Life itself is hard. Jesus knew this and gave us a means to find strength and sustenance. We need physical food and we need spiritual food. It is this that we believe God provides us at Communion as we receive the body and blood of our Lord. Please think seriously about it and consider your own participation!